Emotion

 

 

The degree of one's emotion varies inversely with one's knowledge of the facts -- the less you know the hotter you get.
--Bertrand Russell

 

…it has also been discovered that other areas of the body have high concentrations of almost every neuropeptide receptor known to exist. These areas include the “dorsal horn” or back side of the spinal cord in a pattern analogous to the charkas. In fact, virtually every location where information from any of the five senses enters the nervous system, there are high concentrations of neuropeptide receptors. They are called “nodal points.” The…nucleus of Barrington is a nodal point and , depending on what neuropeptide is occupying its receptors, feelings related to sexual arousal or bathroom functions can be switched or modified, made unconscious, or made a priority. Thus emotions and bodily sensations are intricately intertwined in such a way that each can alter the other – usually at the level of unconsciousness. It can also emerge to consciousness spontaneously, or be deliberately brought to consciousness.

 

All sensory data coming into the body goes through a “filtering” process that may or may not reach the frontal lobes. It is in the frontal lobes that the sensory input enters our consciousness. The efficiency of the filtering process, which chooses what stimuli we pay attention to at any given moment, is determined by the quantity and quality of the receptors at these nodal points. The quantity and quality of these receptors is determined by many things, one of the most important being your experiences.

 

In other words, biochemical changes wrought at the receptor level is the molecular basis of memory. When a receptor is flooded with a ligand, it changes the cell membrane in such a way that the probability of an electrical impulse traveling across the membrane where the receptor resides is facilitated or inhibited, thereafter affecting the choice of neuronal circuitry tat will be used. The principle is important not only for understanding how memories are stored in the brain, but that they are also stored in a psychosomatic network extending into the body itself! It is also the underlying principle of imprinting. Just like a printed circuit is embedded in a computer chip, so are our brains AND our bodies programmed by chemistry and electricity. The decision about what becomes a thought, rising to consciousness, and what remains an “automatic circuit” pattern is buried deep within the body and mediated by the receptors. And memories are stored with their respective emotional content. The emotion can bring up the memory, and conversely, a single “cue” element of the memory can bring on the emotion – even if the memory itself never becomes conscious!

 

What this means in clearest terms is this: many memory processes are emotion-driven and unconscious; but they can sometimes be made conscious.

[…]   What this also means in the plainest terms is that you can “feel love” when the right ligand bonds to the right receptor stimulated by whatever you are programmed to be stimulated by; you will feel it in all the areas where this receptors are clustered; and you will be certain that it IS a positive experience because it “feels so good.” It doesn’t matter if the ligand is being stimulated by a logically consistent experience or by an illogically inculcated program. And until an element of knowledge and logical analysis are brought into the picture, it’s anybody’s best guess where the feelings come from.

 

And that is all fine and good IF it is a positive experience. But statistics of our world in practically every arena of life clearly demonstrate that it is very likely that most of humanity DON’T experience “real love” when their “love ligands” are binding.

 

[…]  More frightening than that is the fact that higher level negative beings can most definitely control our emotions by controlling our chemistry…This means that they can cause us to feel love or hate or aversion or attraction based on their agenda, not our own.

 

[…]  Clearly, based on research, we can see that repressed emotions are stored  in the body via the circuit creation effected by the release of neuropeptide ligands. It is also proposed that when the soul finally “seats” in the body, it’s “wounds” or “scars” will energetically affect the body, producing any number of neuropeptide stimulating frequencies that then “lay circuits” of their own that cannot be related to present life experiences. Hypnosis, yoga practices, deep tissue bodywork, can all be methods used to heal or change the circuits without  the conscious mind ever figuring out what is going on. The drawback is to that, not knowing what is going on prevents the conscious mind from avoiding recurrence.

 

Emotions constantly regulate what we experience as reality. The research suggests that the nervous system scans the outer world fo material that it is prepared top find by virtue of its already laid circuits, its internal patterns of past experience including early imprinting in infancy. The superior colliculus in the mid-brain, another nodal point, controls the muscles that direct the eye-ball, and controls which images are permitted to fall on the retina! This means that an emotional center of the brain literally controls what we see!

 

[…]    What seems to happen when yogis and fakirs learn to control their perception of pain is that they are able to gain access to this area of the brain with conscious intent and to RESET the pain threshold. That is to say: reframed by conscious expectations and subconscious beliefs, pain can be abolished by being interpreted as either a neutral experience or even pleasure.

 

And this is our Ace in the hole. We can make ourselves unavailable for food; we can change our systemic responses so that the Matrix “unplugs us” and dumps us out of the system just like Neo was unceremoniously plucked from his pod when he “woke up.”

 

[…]    It seems that emotions that are generated and /or suppressed due to lack of knowledge can be deadly. Since emotional expression is always tied to a specific flow of peptides in the body, the constant generation and suppression of emotions results in massive disturbances of the psychosomatic network. Many psychologists have said that depression is really suppressed anger or even anger directed against the self…it is essential to learn to transform emotions. We can learn to only have positive emotions.

 

[…]    Denying the realities of the “real world” – denying the reality of the naturalness of the existence of “darkness” is the same as being manipulated to have negative emotions while, at the same time being taught to suppress them. It will still exist; and it will “back up” in your system and become the chief part of your reality because, like blocked emotions, it cannot be “released” so that positive emotions can take its place.

 

…most people misunderstand the difference between "feeling" and higher "emotion." Emotion being, as has been suggested, "movement."  When you "emote" you move from one state of being to another.So, it is probably better to not mix the terms.  Most people already think that "emotion" is, necessarily, a "feeling."  It is not.

 

It is true that emotion can produce "feelings" since it is coming from the top down - the movement of being from state to state affects the chakras which then affect the endocrine system, which then produce chemicals which then produce a physical state. The point of making it "fun" when learning, is to get to that place where this higher state is experienced in a pure way with no shift in the chakras or affect on the endocrine system unless the individual chooses.  To be able to, as the Sufis say: keep a cool head... to transition from state to state with NO "feeling," but simply observation and experience in the higher realms.

 

Unfortunately, many people are affected by "feelings" which are simply looped programs.  The chakras are affected by external impressions from this world, which then affect the endocrine system which then produce chemical, which are then perceived as feelings, which then control thinking. To be able to live in the higher mind without any of the 3rd density effects is the objective.

Laura Knight-Jadczyk The Wave, Part 13

 

 

The development of the emotional centre is the principal object of esoteric culture…it is only through this centre that man can find the key which will open the door to give him access to a higher life.

Boris Mouravieff, Gnosis,Vol.I, 1961/1989 Praxis Press

 

 

Access to the higher emotional centre is access to the level of consciousness of the real individual “I.” Access to the higher intellectual centre raises us to the level of Consciousness – that is to participation in the universal “I” and the interior communion it permits.

Boris Mouravieff, Gnosis, Vol.I, 1961/1989 Praxis Press.

 

 

Men decide far more problems by hate, love, lust, rage, sorrow, joy, hope, fear, illusion, or some other inward emotion than by reality, authority, any legal standard, judicial precedent, or statute.

Marcus Tullius Cicero, De Oratore, III, 100.

 

 

…there is the "knightly type" that has plenty of emotion, and that seems to be the problem. ’Their emotions are more highly developed than their intellect, and they suffer the torments of the damned because they have idealized views of reality - wishful thinking - that are supported by usurpation of sexual energy which is fed into "fantasies" of the intellect which is not grokking the world as it really is“.

And these fantasies align us to STS who relish the idea of such a juicy flow of loosh being channelled and manipulated into its maw “by our own free-will.” This destruction of our potential can be avoided by the "adjustment of our energy" which involves the transmutation of our negative emotions.

 

[…]

 

"We do not register the messages of the higher centers which are ceaselessly working in us at full capacity. This is not only because our lower centers are under-developed, but also because they are not equilibrated."

This is begun by the process of discerning between the STS and STO influences, which Mouravieff calls the "A" and "B" influences. The connection to the higher centers is established gradually, starting with the lower emotonal center which, by being purified and developed. It then makes contact with the higher emotional center, and through this higher emotional center, connection is made with the higher intellectual center. And here is where we come to another truth corrupted by religions and the New Age gang: Escape is possible only via the heart which is why cultivation of the emotional center dominates the attention of the esoteric tradition.

 

Once the magnetic center begins to grow - as a result of discerning and ”collecting” (acting on) STO influences - it establishes direct ties between the lower centers so that the individual centers begin to act independently, but under the strict supervision of the magnetic center which ensures their coordination. We then stop being victims of impulsive actions to impressions and shocks from the outside, and become more reflective and conscious.

This evolution of the magnetic center can be a long process - an "uninterrupted combat." But the result is nothing less than the transformation of the individual…

 

[…]

 

If we resist such tests, such lies, such illusions, if we consistently choose the STO influences, the *I* of the personality will come more and more into alignment with the magnetic center of STO. The more the *I* of the personality remains in that magnetic center of STO thinking, and the more it identifies with it, the more the growth of the center will progress.

The more the magnetic center grows by the conscious work to discern and choose alignment, the sooner it begins to absorb the lower emotional center while "drawing toward" the higher emotional center, all the while balancing the lower intellectual and moving centers. This CONNECTING of the Emotional Centers by the magnetic center results in man # 5. [This represents the crossing of the second threshold or the second Birth where the True Way begins.]

Laura Knight-Jadczyk on Emotions

 

 

An emotion is a tendency to feel, and an instinct is a tendency to act, characteristically, when in the presence of a certain object in the environment. But the emotions also have their bodily “expression,” which may involve strong muscular activity (as in fear or anger, for example); and it becomes a little hard in many cases to separate the description of the “emotional” condition from that of the “instinctive” reaction which one and the same object may provoke.... Every object that excites an instinct excites an emotion as well. The only distinction one may draw is that the reaction called emotional terminates in the subject’s own body, whilst the reaction called instinctive is apt to go farther and enter into practical relations with the exciting object.

William James Psychology: The Briefer Course, 1891.

 

 

It is not an exaggeration to say that negative emotions are mainly responsible for the fact that human beings age and die prematurely. To combat old age and death, one must combat the negative emotions in oneself. ...When treated according to precise rules founded on a strenuous psychical discipline, these very same emotions, though harmful, can become an abundant source of the fine, active energies whose presence is NECESSARY for the development of the Personality.

 

[…]

 

…the atrophy of the negative part of the intellectual center prevents man from having any doubts, it also partially blinds his intelligence and takes away his capacity for appreciation, criticism and comparison, etc.

 

The same may be said for the emotional center. Its negative part is necessary to ensure its complete functioning: while the positive part responds to agreeable impressions coming from the outside or the inside, the negative part responds in the same way to disagreeable impressions.

This is the normal role of the negative half of the emotional center - which might be called its "positive role."

 

If the awakened and pure emotional center were deprived of its negative part, the affective life would be impoverished and disoriented. This situation could be compared to one in which we would be able to feel heat without being able to feel cold, or see light without being able to distinguish shadows. When it is awake and functioning normally, the negative part of the emotional center is an organ in the psychological structure of the Personality which is just as indispensable as the positive part.

Boris Mouravieff, Gnosis Vol.I, 1961/1989 Praxis Press

 

 

 

Sensuous contentment (improperly so called) which rests on the satisfaction of inclinations, however refined they may be, can never be adequate to that which is conceived under contentment. For inclinations vary; they grow with the indulgence we allow them, and they leave behind a greater void than the one we intended to fill. They are consequently always burdensome to a rational being, and, though he cannot put them aside, they nevertheless elicit from him the wish to be free of them.

Immanuel Kant, Critique of Practical Reason

 

Emotions are culturally specific and variable. It also supports a systematic theory of emotions which could encompass other psychological phenomena as well. This theory, known as activity theory, maintains that emotions are cultural phenomena because a) they are socially constructed artifacts which are functionally independent of biological determinants; b) their characteristics reflect (recapitulate) the social organization of activities and the cultural content of concepts; c) emotions are formed through socialization which ultimately reflects social activities and cultural concepts; and d) emotions support, or reproduce, cultural activities. Specifically, emotions rest upon a biological substratum which potentiates a wide range of emotional reactions but does not strictly determine any of them. The socially organized ways in which people act, think, and are treated in their cultural activities -- e.g., their responsibilities, rights, obligations, behavioral norms, opportunities, rewards -- stimulate the development of emotions, are reflected in the characteristics of emotions, and are the ultimate function of emotions.

 

Emphasizing the activity basis of emotions produces the most vivid description and explanation of emotions because it ties them to the vibrant richness of real life. It relates emotions to the dynamic changes which are occurring in the world economy, to the kinds of governments and legal systems people live in, to the manner in which medical care is dispensed, to changes in family relations and the educational systems children grow up in, to the art that is produced and the media that people are exposed to, to spectacular technological innovations/artifacts, and to the changing physical infrastructure of towns and cities. Overlooking activity leads to overlooking many specific cultural features of emotions. It also leads to incomplete explanations of emotions' characteristics, formation, and function.

emotions [lie] within the realm of rational analysis and transformation. Inappropriate, debilitating, and antisocial emotions can be overcome through altering their cultural characteristics. Since these characteristics rest upon cultural concepts and activities, substantive emotional change among large numbers of people requires changes in cultural activities and cultural concepts -- as historical evidence on anger, fear, and love demonstrate. Changes in socialization practices are vital to enhancing emotionality. However, such changes also require broad improvements in social activities and concepts. Disregarding activities prevents altering the social fabric that fosters particular emotions. It thus consigns people to living with inappropriate, debilitating, and antisocial emotions.

Of course, individuals can change certain aspects of emotions without considering their links to cultural activities and concepts. One can express anger less intensely and love more intensely without engaging in a cultural analysis of emotions. However, these changes are superficial in the sense that they do not challenge the basic content, or quality, of emotions. They do not challenge the cultural content of love to make it more realistic, rational, and socially oriented. They do not challenge the conceptual underpinning of anger which holds people personally responsible for harm which they inflict. Substantial changes in the characteristics of emotions require understanding and altering the cultural activities and concepts which organize them. These are the practical implications of a cultural-psychological analysis of emotions from the standpoint of revised activity theory.

Carl Ratner from his paper on A Cultural-Psychological Analysis of Emotions,

2000

 

 

…There are quite a number of people who do not like to read about what they call "negative" things. They don't like the material we produce that exposes the Matrix. They don't like to read "negative" things because they only want to read or experience "positive" things. They perceive the material we have gathered as "negative" because it "induces fear" or they describe it as "fear based." What never occurs to them is that there is a REASON for this. It is only in the process of repeatedly being exposed to "negative emotions" and learning how to transmute this energy that there is any hope of achieving freedom from "warm and fuzzy lies" and achieving "ascension."

Laura Knight Jadczyk,’s article ‘Ascension: The Search for the Holy Grail‘ – with extracts from: Ancient Science: A Radical Reassessment of Myth, History,The Legends of the Holy Grail, and the Science of Ascension – please visit: http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/c%27sbook.htm

 

 

We are made addicts inside our own skins.

Laura Knight Jadczyk, The Wave, Part 13e

 

 

Two people can look at the same object and yet receive a completely different impression of the object. Language expresses our IMPRESSIONS. No language can BE the "original."  It is only a copy.

 

Knowledge and Truth are part of the unchanging Spirit World.  Thus, the "essence" of a thing that exists in this "Platonic world" is unchanging.  This is a "B" influence or impression.  The difference in the impressions brings out the difference in the movement of the soul. 

 

The more a Human Being is subject to or influenced by his desires, cravings, or the domination of his physical senses as "led" by prejudice, belief in authorities who may be lying, or self-conceit, the less "accurate" his copy of the essence of a thing will be.

 

Receiving impressions, forming ideas, communicating ideas are all parts of the "copy of the copy of the copy of the original" process. Language operates in accordance with the perfection of the being.

 

Collecting and assmilating "B" influences consists in correctly understanding the essence - of being able to "see" the original or to "cognize" the original in one's imagination - even if the "copy of the copy of the copy" is faulty or bad, or misrepresents the "original."

 

[…]

 

Talking about the "heart" and the "intellect" from one conceptualization would mean talking about chemical emotions and the workings of the brain.  That is to say, purely material functions. Yet we have been talking quite a bit about the "emotional center" or the "heart center."

 

Are we making good "copies" of these essential things, or do we have very poor copies?  Do we really understand what the "emotional/heart center" really is?

 

We know that we can feel happy or sad because we receive certain "impressions" and these impressions produce "movement" inside us.  One person can see a man walking down the street wearing a blue cap and experience a very

positive feeling about this totally neutral event because it evokes in him the memory of a friend with an identical blue cap.

 

Another person can see the man walking down the street wearing a blue cap, and feel a surge of fear because it evokes in him the memory of the fact that he was mugged last year by a guy in an identical blue cap. How many millions upon millions of our "impressions" of the world around us are similarly "influenced" by our previous experiences? 

 

And we call what is evoked in us "feelings."  We say "I get a good FEELING from that guy."  Or we say "I get a bad FEELING from that guy." But in neither case is this "feeling" - if evoked as described above - a "B" influence.  Whether we know it or not, we are judging the guy by the context of the Blue cap. 

 

So, the point is, when talking about the "heart" or the "emotional center," we are talking about something essential that MAY be pure in its energy, but it is our organism - our material senses - that "translate" that energy into "effects."  The Effect of the Energy of the "heart center" is to "read" the clues a certain way.  And these clues may be true or false.

 

If we could KNOW by some other means the TRUTH of the essence of the man walking down the street in the blue cap, without the "input" of our senses which are programmed by our previous experiences - our context - and the concepts we have formed out of them - then we would be "in touch" with or "reading" the "B" influences. 

If a Human Being would not be obstructed by the coarser organization of their physical bodies, they would recognize the impact of the finest of the finest of impressions.  Then, language as we know it would not be necessary. There would be "direct cognition." 

 

If we could look at the man walking down the street wearing the blue cap and directly cognize him - make contact - without copies of copies of copies - there would be direct transfer of the "original" soul to soul.

 

Developing and growing this "intelligence of the heart" is the object of "assimilating B influences."

Laura Knight Jadczyk on Eckartshausen and Assimilating “B” influences